The purpose of this study is to describe the mediation arrangements in the settlement of industrial relations disputes that do not yet reflect the value of justice in accordance with Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning the settlement of industrial relations disputes, the reconstruction of mediation arrangements in Article 9, 11 and 13 paragraph (2) of Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning the settlement of industrial relations disputes based on justice values. This research is non-doctrinal in socio-legal studies. This research was conducted at the Batam City Government Employment Agencies. This study uses primary data and secondary data (primary legal materials and secondary legal materials). Retrieval of primary data through interviews, while secondary data through document study. Data analysis was performed descriptively-qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that the mediation regulations in the settlement of industrial relations disputes are currently not fair, especially for the workers. Mediation that is not successfully completed through the Government Employment Agencies or for those who feel unjust will proceed to the next stage, which is to go to the industrial relations court. Mediation disputes over industrial relations disputes that have occurred so far have not found justice for the parties to the litigation. The perceived injustice resulted in the parties having to proceed to the next stage or through an industrial relations court. in addition to getting results that are equally beneficial to both.